Jack,

All valid points but take note of K9HZ's work as a start.  Nevertheless, let's 
say native Ethernet control isn't worth the engineering effort.  That should 
not preclude the integration of RemoteRig as an option into a K3/K3s.  

If I didn't care about the resale value of my K3 or RemoteRig, I could easily 
turn this into a weekend construction project and be up and running on Monday 
morning with an Ethernet cable hanging from the back of the K3.  

The RemoteRig board would come out of its enclosure then mount in the K3.  It's 
just a matter of adding an RJ45 port, tapping +12V, internal audio, RS-232, 
PTT, key line, and ACC.  The tapping of RS232 and audio is not trivial but it 
is completely manageable. 

While this adds little additional operational utility than it does now, it 
significantly cleans up K3 cabling with RemoteRig.  No change is needed at the 
client end for use with the K3 mini.  For K3 clients, a similar integration 
could accomplished or kept as it is now with external cabling.  

Of course, there must be enough demand from remote users to make it worthwhile 
as well as cooperation from Microbit. 

Paul, W9AC


Sent from my iPhone6

> On Jul 19, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Jack Brindle <jackbrin...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> Paul;
> 
> What is your proposal for the host-side interface? Pretty much all host 
> programs these days use a serial interface. We usually use this through a 
> USB-Serial adapter or through built-in serial ports, which are rapidly 
> disappearing. To make this viable we would need drivers for all major 
> platforms that implement a serial port  driver interface to ethernet. Or, the 
> host programs will need to be modified. 
> 
> There is a lot of work needed to make this suggestion viable, both on the 
> host and radio sides. This is the fact same reason we still use serial 
> interfaces for our rigs instead of true USB interface.
> Put forth a good proposal and let it be considered. Without that work 
> (whoever does it), ethernet hardware isn’t very useful.
> 
> - Jack, W6FB
> 
> p.s., no, this isn’t a flame, but a challenge. Let’s get the whole thing 
> viable, then we will take a good look at implementing it on all sides.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 19, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Paul Christensen <w...@arrl.net> wrote:
>> 
>> This inquiry is directed to both the Elecraft leadership team as well as
>> K3/K3s owners who may have an interest in native Ethernet connectivity.   In
>> searching through the list archives, I noted that some K3 owners had
>> previously expressed an interest in an Ethernet option - and some owners
>> have been disappointed that the new K3s and KIO3B board does not include
>> Ethernet connectivity.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> A bit of background: for the past few months, N4CC and I have been operating
>> a remote Internet station that's located near the FL/GA state line.  Our
>> setup includes a K3 and RemoteRig at the remote site and either a K3 or
>> K3-mini at the control locations.  Since the installation, we've experienced
>> almost no operating trouble and any issues that have developed are managed
>> remotely though direct and back-door network access points. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Last week, I made some internal changes to the K3  and also added an
>> external USB data interface device for RTTY.  What's apparent is that cable
>> management is getting way out of control.  To gain inside access to the K3
>> almost requires a meditation exercise before going in.  Consider that a PR6
>> is mounted to the back of the K3.  The rear of the K3 is an absolute rat's
>> nest of cabling.  With the RemoteRig and PR6, It was bad enough before the
>> inclusion of the external USB sound car/interface, but now it's bordering on
>> ridiculous.   Moreover, RemoteRig does not allow clean access to the K3's
>> ACC DB-15 connector for other purposes such as FSK keying.  Sure, the
>> connector can be opened to access pins, but it requires a wiring break-out,
>> leading to yet a further rat's nest of cabling.    
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> To help deal with the cabling issues, I am replacing the external PR6 with
>> the new KXVB3 board.  Next, a KIO3B board will be added when it's available
>> to existing K3 owners.  That should eliminate the external sound card
>> interface and clear up much of the cabling mess, but not all of it.  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Holy Grail is an Ethernet interface that includes (optional) integrated
>> RemoteRig hardware - just one interface board [e.g., KIO3E(thernet) board]
>> that manages K3 Ethernet connectivity with or without RemoteRig attributes.
>> Don't need Ethernet? Then don't get the board.  Since the RemoteRig hardware
>> is mature and consumes little circuit board space and DC current, perhaps it
>> would be worth opening up a discussion with RemoteRig's designer since
>> Elecraft already has a close relationship with Microbit.    I know rear
>> panel real estate is a concern, so it won't be easy to add yet another
>> connector without adversely affecting other connectivity.  Thoughts?     
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Paul, W9AC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to jackbrin...@me.com
> 
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to