K3: Better performance, more features. Good base-station radio. K2: Smaller. lighter, built-in battery. Good QRP portable radio.
Al N1AL On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 12:39 -0700, Gary D Krause wrote: > Why do you still have both? The K2 is my main station rig. I recently > considered buying a K3 and even went to the Elecraft web site to order it. > Each time I backed off so that I could think more about it. In the end, I > decided to add a couple of options to my K2. I could still order a K3 if I > want but, I'm afraid my K2 would just sit and gather dust. I don't want to > sell it after spending all that time putting it together including the > options. I see comments that the reciever is so much better on the K3 > compared to the K2. How much better? I don't know of anyone that has a K3 > to > listen to. I've watched and listened to the Youtube videos but, the sound is > only as good as my pc speakers and the camera that recorded it so, that's not > much to go by. The specs look better on the K3 compared to the K2 but, not > by > much. For the kind of operating I do, the K2 is great. The K3 is always > there in the back of my mind, though. In some respects, the K3 really sucks! > ;-) > > Gary, N7THS > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
