Dear John B. Hodges, you wrote (1 Sep 2003): > This method has been called "Generalized Bucklin", and AFAICT > could also be called "Majority Choice Approval". My question, > for one and all: Is there any desirable quality, that any > single-winner method has, that this method does not have?
Condorcet, Condorcet Loser, Consistency, Independence of Clones, Reversal Symmetry, Smith, later-no-harm, Participation. Markus Schulze ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
