> On Jun 26, 2025, at 5:16 AM, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would keep contents of this section either in the current article or in > archive (but accessible from web). Certainly it should be marked as a > historical artifact. >
Honestly, I’m not seeing there being much value to having the Opera section kept intact either as an archive (which is problematic as there is no archive file for org-protocol.org) or in a history section as the guidance it provides isn’t really actionable. This text is under source control, so if it needs to be resuscitated it can be. > Org protocol is quite fragile. I faced enough pitfalls when I was setting it > up several years ago. I have seen various recipes in blog posts and other web > pages, but I was not sure if that info was still useful. I think, we may save > some time for new users by clearly saying that specific instructions were > applicable several years ago, but there is no point to try them now even if > org-protocol does not work. The guidance org-protocol.org <http://org-protocol.org/> provided before the rewrite steered me down so many dead ends. That frustration drives much of my motivation to rewrite it. While I have tried to be mindful of previous contributors work on this, I would rather not treat it as gospel. — Charles Y. Choi, Ph.D. kickingve...@gmail.com
