Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paag...@gmail.com> writes: >> Even though you did split the paragraph, it is IMHO, not yet ideal. >> When I read the two paragraph one after another I feel confused. >> When I read the LaTeX section from the beginning, I feel even more >> confused - what do these paragraphs do in LaTeX/PDF export commands section? >> >> Maybe we can simply remove the above paragraphs, moving the information >> under LaTeX specific export settings? > > It was intended as an introduction to *** LaTeX specific export settings > You are right, we can mostly remove them. I added a sentence at the > beginning of the text in that section. > I hope this small additions makes reading a bit easier.
This time you removed too much :) You lost fn:48, for example. You completely removed `org-latex-bibtex-compiler' description from the manual. And you forgot to move all the cindex and vindex entries associated with that removed paragraph to more appropriate place. > BTW, reading there: >>That's because LaTeX itself depends >> on blank lines to tell apart syntactical elements, such as paragraphs. > > Couldn't we simplify this to: >> That's because LaTeX itself depends >> on blank lines to separate paragraphs. I'd say yes, especially when someone more familiar with LaTeX is pointing this. >> I previously suggested "... merging description of LANGUAGE and >> LATEX_MULTI_LANG into one record, similar to =LATEX_HEADER=, >> =LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA=, but you did it differently, not merging >> descriptions into a single description. Why? > > I just moved them to be next to one another, right. I hesitated to merge them > because there are situations where #+LANGUAGE is /just/ informative. Fair. I am ok with this. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
