Hi Tom, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Tom Regner <t...@goochesa.de> wrote: > Hi, > > suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I see source blocks formated as example blocks. Is that the same as you >> are seeing? If so, I wouldn't call that support for source blocks. I >> would expect to see syntax highlighting like pure source files on >> GitHub. > > org-ruby is in it's current form not capable to do that, but it's > currently actively developed [fn:1] (maybe not for org-mode standards :-D, > the last > commit was 8 days ago) and there are a few items on the todo list. > > And all shortcomings aside, an update on github/markups side would at > least make the usage of org-documents on github bearable. >
Sorry if my comments seemed like a complaint/gripe. When an org-mode user says, "feature bla" is supported they usually mean the whole thing, with all the bells and whistles (e.g. source block would imply with syntax highlighting). So I just wanted to clarify it was incorrect to say "source blocks are supported". > Only sufficient demand for org-documents will foster betterment I guess. > Yes I realise that. I have never interacted with GitHub staff for feature requests. Being a long time org-mode user (post-6.33, that's ages in org years :-p), maybe I should give that a try. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.