On 2010-01-26, at 09:58 , Ian Eiloart wrote:
> 
> It's the native IMAP model, so ought to be easier to implement. We're also 
> talking about expert users here.
> 
> Undelete is easier, because it's obvious where the message was before it was 
> deleted.
> 
> Of course, Letters should allow users to choose which model they use. But, 
> Trash can be implemented in the client as a matter of presentation - it's 
> just another message collection (all the messages that are marked "deleted")

I like the IMAP model, it's a lot more straightforward. Having a mailbox for 
trash is annoying.

But… Ehr… can I ask how gmail handles delete/expunge?


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com

Reply via email to