Chris Radek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:37:07PM -0400, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > >>You could always save the offsets in other vars, like #1001..#1009 = >>#5211..#5219 when you touch off. >>Then, when you do the G92.1 to reset, just move to 0,0,0 (,0,0,0), and issue >>G92 X#1001 Y#1002 Z#1003 (maybe negative, you'd have to experiment) >>to restore the original G54 offset. > > > G92.1 **does** put you back at the original G54 offset. The G54 > variables are not changed by the G92 codes. > > I think everyone wants to make this more difficult than it is. Well, now my understanding of the work offsets, G92, G54/G55 etc. and all is totally fouled up! I'm going to have to go and read the docs, and play with the system a bunch more, and try to figure out what does what!
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
