On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 23:07 -0500, Chris Radek wrote: > I see what you're trying to do now.
Yep. Jon's program offsets from whatever 0,0 it used for the first one. What I can't for the life of me figure out is how Jon accomplished that by setting g54 to that location and expected the other coordinate settings to follow that. I've reread all of the NIST interpreter publications and a good bit of the original source this evening and there is no mention anywhere of g54 taking that sort of primacy. The earliest interpreter report did indicate that g54 could not be offset. It was the machine origin. That was 1994. By version two, the one that Jon and I were using in 2000 all nine offsets had been implemented and g92 offset them all. Thanks for the walk down memory lane. I'll shut up now. Rayh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
