Il giorno lun, 13/02/2012 alle 20.23 -0600, Jon Elson ha scritto: > Spiderdab wrote: > > Yes I've tried using G64, but maybe i didn't know how this worked. > > because i didn't have the expected resulting. > > > > Just because you mentioned, is it correct to use such a line at the > > beginning of the g-code file: > > G64 Pp Qq > > > > in which p is the maximum distance admitted from the point, and q...well > > i don't know how to explain, but i understood it was what i needed. But > > i've tried with different values either for p and q, and nothing > > changed. the result was as if without using G64. > > So maybe i was wrong in using that. > > > > > It is G64.1 Pxxx. G64 turns on some smoothing, G64.1 turns on more (and I'm > vastly oversimplifying it.) Well, maybe they have changed it, but I'm > pretty sure > I used G64.1 Pxxx, but looking at section 3.1.3 it doesn't say that. > http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/EMC2_User_Manual.pdf > > Jon I've never read about G64.1 , but I believe you and going to try that in these days. What i've read also on that pdf is that with a P0 i have the best velocity following, but also that it is the normal way LinuxCNC works, even if you omit G64. Is it? and, I really cannot understand what Q does (naive) and if you have to use Q together with P or without.
Davide. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
