wouldn't de-Cornerizing have to happen regardless? He did contribute quite a bit before the schism.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Chris Radek <ch...@timeguy.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:25:55PM +0100, Michael Haberler wrote: > > > The hal and rtapi commits need study but I feel confident with > > de-Cornerizing those The task, motion and interpreter commits need > > Do you have reason to believe that PC is the only contributor who is > problematic: either unwilling to consent to a relicense to GPLv2+ or > simply uncontactable? > > If you have, please share before we prematurely worry about > "de-Cornerizing". > > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester > Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the > endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to > tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
