Hi again:
    My comments on people getting experience with running an EDM is Not 
directed at any one person.  It's just that this art form is so different from 
what most people have experienced in machine shops.  Go play with one and many 
of these mysteries will become clearer.  

>  Or is there a better material to make the electrode from?
You'll be rich when you figure that out.  Find a way to 3-D print an electrode 
and you'll set the world on fire.  Or 3-D print the heat-treated steel mold 
cavity directly!
    Many writers (not me because I don't know) state that electrode wear occurs 
at the initiation of the spark and that the wear is due to heat at the 
electrode surface that isn't conducted away fast enough.  For those who haven't 
seen it, that is likely why finish electrodes/ burns have such high wear rates. 
 They endure so very many more sparks than a roughing burn which has sparks of 
higher power but longer duration so there are far less of them.

Question:
    Does anybody know the typical frequency or pulses per second for finishing 
burns?  I think it's on the order of 3-5kHz but will look into it of someone 
doesn't already know.  40kHz servo response is very responsive but not 
necessary if the spark frequency is less than that.

Pete Gruendeman
     
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 3/2/16, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] EDM gap control (Control parameters)
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2016, 11:38 PM
 
 On Wednesday 02 March
 2016 23:53:36 TJoseph Powderly wrote:
 
 > sorry Pete
 > I
 disagree, any time spent in the wrong position is time spent
 making
 > bad discharges
 > which can damage surface by overheating
 > or
 > spend time
 throwing snowballs that fall short of hitting the target
 > imo, update postion as fast as possible
 > the average velocity ( a RESULT)  will be
 low
 > but the process will be more
 stabile and the surface will not be hard
 > and crusty
 > abd the
 time will be lower
 > oops power fail in
 ChiangMai
 > ttyl8r
 >
 tomp
 
 One thing I have
 always felt needed to be asked, but don't recall seeing
 
 it discussed, is when doing a sinker edm to
 imprint a carbon mold like 
 I've seen
 pix of, like engraving a relieved signature, is there an 
 optimum current per square, either in cm2 or
 in2 to design the process 
 to so it
 functions best?
 
 And in
 terms of wear on the shaped carbon electrode, is there a
 best 
 current per square in terms of the
 metal removed vs the carbon wasted 
 that
 will prolong the electrode life vs metal removed?  I've
 seen other 
 processes where optimizing one
 is not optimizing the other.
 
 Or is there a better material to make the
 electrode from?
 
 > On
 03/02/2016 10:05 PM, Pete_Gruendeman wrote:
 > > Hi Nicklas:
 >
 >      Correct that looping once per millisecond is
 definitely fast
 > >
 enough.   On my machine, 40,000 encoder counts =
 1 inch.  Spark
 > > lengths, even for
 finishing operations are 0.001" or longer, or 40
 > > encoder counts to go from first spark
 to the electrode making
 > > physical
 contact and that's in 1/25th of a second.  That's
 not a
 > > problem if the machine is
 moving at 2- 4 inches per minute.  At 4
 > > IPM, coming to a stop in 0.001 inches
 requires an acceleration of
 > >
 -0.01852 feet per second squared or -0.00058 g's of
 acceleration. 
 > > No problem.
 > >
 > >      The
 other axes would be the same in that gap voltage/current
 > > measurement at 1,000 times per second
 is plenty fast enough.  In
 > > fact,
 the program I wrote upon detection of gap voltage too low
 > > waits on location for 10 milliseconds
 and then checks again as often
 > > the
 situation of the electrode being too close clears itself in
 that
 > > much time.  I didn't
 differentiate between gap voltage being too low
 > > and it being zero (physical
 contact).  If I did, then the signal to
 > > back out should have been given
 without any delay.
 > >
 > > Pete Gruendeman
 >
 >
 > >
 --------------------------------------------
 > > On Wed, 3/2/16, Nicklas Karlsson
 <[email protected]>
 > > wrote:
 > >
 > >   Subject: Re:
 [Emc-developers] EDM gap control (Control parameters)
 > >   To:
 "Pete_Gruendeman" <[email protected]>,
 "EMC developers"
 > > <[email protected]>
 Date: Wednesday, March 2,
 > > 2016,
 4:12 AM
 > >
 >
 >   > ...
 >
 >   > All of this start, stop, backup
 motion
 > >
 >
 >   will result in an average rate of travel
 that is on the
 > >   order
 of inches per hour.  It's not fast.  Though the
 > >   positioning rate for
 forward and reverse motion can be
 >
 >   inches per minute.
 >
 >
 > >   > ...
 > >
 >
 >   Then it is so slow as at
 > >   maximum inches per
 minute there is no point with
 >
 >   position/velocity loop faster than once
 each millisecond?
 > >
 > >   For Z-axis there would
 be no
 > >   problem with
 40kHz servo loop if needed.
 > >
 > >   Regards Nicklas
 Karlsson
 > >
 > >
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 > >---------- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get
 Deep Visibility into Application
 > >
 Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances
 at just
 > > $35/Month Monitor
 end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
 > > actions now Troubleshoot faster and
 improve end-user experience.
 > >
 Signup Now!
 > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
 > >
 _______________________________________________
 > > Emc-developers mailing list
 > > [email protected]
 > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
 >
 >
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >-------- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep
 Visibility into Application
 > Performance
 APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
 > $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web
 transactions and take corrective
 >
 actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user
 experience.
 > Signup Now!
 > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
 >
 _______________________________________________
 > Emc-developers mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
 
 
 Cheers, Gene
 Heskett
 -- 
 "There are
 four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in
 that order."
 -Ed Howdershelt
 (Author)
 Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
 Application Performance
 APM + Mobile APM +
 RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
 Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take
 corrective actions now
 Troubleshoot faster
 and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
 _______________________________________________
 Emc-developers mailing list
 [email protected]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to