James, No biggy. I have tripped over my own tongue/fingers here as well. Actually knocking up a demo would be nice from a working discussion. I would say for speed and efficiency a couple of IPython notebooks with exemplars would go a long way.
Also, my comment on Rust and maintenance was to make sure that everyone had an idea of the consequences they were asking. If I was going to go with a new language, I would also take a serious look at Go, but I am not seriously advocating that ;-) On Oct 27 2016 7:01 AM, James Waples wrote: > EBo, > > You're right, in hindsight that wasn't a very well thought out > statement. > What I meant was to discuss what a minimal reimplementation would > look like > and doing that relatively quickly, as opposed to nailing down the > entire > desired feature set with a much longer discussion period. > > This is a common pain point for Rust generally at the moment; nobody > knows > it! Unfortunately I can't commit to maintaining an LCNC component > written > in Rust, so a more commonly known language like C or Python does make > sense. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! http://sdm.link/telerik _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
