It does seem to be the case that commercial courses offered for EMI 
     prevention are developed by people with something to sell. Still, not 
     all are aimed at 11th  hour solutions.  Few people in the field really 
     favor this kind of fix. It isn't integrated with product esthetics 
     (translation:  it can be ugly), it isn't considered in mechanical 
     design, so it may not fit well, and it's costly.  These points are all 
     emphasized by courses originating in test labs, rather than 
     product-specific vendors.
     
     However, the original question was whether courses in complying with 
     regulations should be offered in college.  Isn't this issue more an 
     engineering ethics problem, and a social consequence of our work, than 
     a problem of technical design?  Getting compliance designed in can be 
     much harder than discovering when it is not.  
     
     Regards,
     
     Cortland
     

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Regulatory compliance training for students
Author:  dmck...@paragon-networks.com (Doug McKean) at internet
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:    1/23/97 10:12


Why is the talk centered around safety? 
          
Safety specs are construction and performance. 
They tell you what to do. No secret there. 
          
Emissions specs are performance specs. They say nothing 
about construction. Only one course I've seen for emi/emc 
offered at a school was a graduate class one semester. 
          
Even still, some things some people call 'fixes' have been 
11th hour gasket/ferrite panic fixes as the primary emi 
control procedure.  In fact, starting out in the field of 
emi/emc, all one can hope for to large extent are 'courses' 
sponsered by gasket/ferrite people who want you to 
improperly primary design so that you keep them in 
business. 
          
          
************************************************************ 
------------------------------------------------------------
   The comments and opinions stated herein are mine alone, 
   and do not reflect those of my employer.
------------------------------------------------------------ 
************************************************************

Reply via email to