The OM was just an example for purposes of illustration. A better name for such a hypothetical beast would be World Mark (WM). If you read the earlier thread, you would have read that all the agencies are getting out of hand and that it would be nice to do testing once, then apply for a OM? or WM? and be allowed to sell your product any place in the world
Daniel W. Mitchell Product Safety EOS Corp. ---------- From: Grasso, Charles (Chaz)[SMTP:gra...@louisville.stortek.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 1998 10:25 AM To: Dan Mitchell; 'Peter E. Perkins' Cc: PSNetwork Subject: RE: Are all these agencies really necessary? Would someone please explain the OM (Overall Mark)? Thank you Charles Grasso (Captain Hook) EMC Engineer StorageTek 2270 Sth 88th Street Louisville CO 80027 MS 4262 gra...@louisville.stortek.com Tel:(303)673-2908 Fax(303)661-7115 > ---------- > From: Peter E. Perkins[SMTP:peperk...@compuserve.com] > Reply To: Peter E. Perkins > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 11:57 PM > To: Dan Mitchell > Cc: PSNetwork > Subject: Are all these agencies really necessary? > > PSNet & Dan, > > > The OM (Overall Mark) is a good idea that continues to be promoted > by industry, especially multinational businesses. Oh that they had > control > to proscribe it... Remember that the underlying basis for all of this is > a > political issue in that nations want to control commerce in some manner - > and many of the old-time controls have been taken away by treaty (the GATT > Treaty). We work in an arena where the high level politicians tug and > pull > to get their way. We see it in the expansion of the need to have a > certification or mark on the products. Developing nations have figured > out > that they can easily play this game - just adapt the international > standards - ISO/IEC/CISPR, etc. - but demand a local mark of approval. The > country supports a team of technical and bureauocratic personel thru the > tax that you pay to get their bumper sticker. Americans, especially, like > free enterprise = no restraints. Big business promoted the use of a > manufacturer's based mark for Europe (the CE marking), but were not too > happy that there is personal criminal penalty attached to signing the MDoC > and applying the mark. Much of the rest of the world isn't ready for > the > whole potato all at once either. Note the problems that the Japanese and > the Koreans are having trying to reform their old-boy networks to open > their markets and offer opportunity for growth there... I predict that it > will get worse before it gets better... So, look at it as job security, > at > least you're working (which is better than the alternative)... > > > - - - - - > > Peter E Perkins > Principal Product Safety Consultant > Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 > > +1/503/452-1201 phone/fax > > p.perk...@ieee.org email > > visit our website: > > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/peperkins > > - - - - - > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.com > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, > ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.co (the list > administrators). > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.com with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.co (the list administrators).
