I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> wrote (in <20020101060002.GSJY27550.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]> ) about 'EMC-related safety issues', on Mon, 31 Dec 2001:
>KJJ response to JW: The aircraft receivers in question are just that, radio >receivers, and as such are the sensitive victims protected by CE and RE >limits as I described earlier. There is nothing controversial here at all. The length and detail of your response indicates otherwise! >The fact that personal consumer electronics may be able to affect such >radios is not surprising. Well, it surprises me. The emissions from most of these products (except laptops) are quite weak. Since these are said to present a significant threat, I wonder that different systems within the aircraft's own electronic installation can practicably be prevented from interacting adversely. >It is not necessary to assume an out-of-band >response, either. Of course not, but resistance to in-band interference can be very high if suitable modulation schemes and signal formats are used. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
