Nonetheless, John, when I look at old, published versions of the 60950 standard, the number used was '950.' How cavalier of them.
Peter > From: John Woodgate > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:16 PM > Peter Tarver <peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com> writes > > > 950 based standards (being period correct, here: > >no 60 prefix) since about 1995 and possibly longer. > > Not really: the IEC wants all references to include '60', because it > could be '61' instead, and soon could be '62' instead: > > IEC 61950 (1997-06) > Cable management systems - Specification for conduits fittings for > electrical installations for extra-heavy duty metal conduit > > John Woodgate _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned by Sanmina-SCI eShield _______ _____________________________________________________________________ - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
