In message <be3336be85968d49be01e66d6e365b1e9fe...@sjc1amfpew01.am.sanm.corp>, dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Peter Tarver <peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com> writes
>This type of evaluation has been in Annex P.2 of the CSA/UL >implementation of the 950 based standards (being period correct, here: >no 60 prefix) since about 1995 and possibly longer. Not really: the IEC wants all references to include '60', because it could be '61' instead, and soon could be '62' instead: IEC 61950 (1997-06) Cable management systems - Specification for conduits fittings for electrical installations for extra-heavy duty metal conduit -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
