In message <c2a88b41.586d4%[email protected]>, dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes:
> As Mr. Woodgate pointed out earlier in this thread, if you put things >closer together than the separation distance at which they were >qualified, all bets are off. Well, not quite, because there is, or is alleged to be, a 'secret' margin built in there, too. But it doesn't allow for separations of approximately 1 m or less. In some cases, there is enough information available from various sources to calculate the separation distance at which reception of a given radio signal is intolerably impaired. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
