I'm not sure I follow Mr. Owsley's message 100%, but there are a couple of
fallacious assumptions if  I follow it correctly.

In turn:

The idea that a piece of medical equipment qualified to an emission limit
(with or without margin) to be met at three or ten meters is supposed to
automatically not interfere with an antenna that could be much closer to it
than three meters.  As Mr. Woodgate pointed out earlier in this thread, if you
put things closer together than the separation distance at which they were
qualified, all bets are off.  Now the antenna will be on the outside of the
largely metal ambulance, and the medical equipment inside, but there is no way
to accurately account for that, except a real EMC test.  More on that in a
moment.

The idea that because the medical equipment was qualified to 1, 3 or 10 V/m
per EN61000-4-3 and 1000-4-6 (with or without margin), it should automatically
be immune to rf transmissions originating from an antenna mounted on the
ambulance.  The degree of compatibility depends on the characteristics of the
transmit antenna,  how much power is dumped into it, and how much radiation
leaks into the ambulance interior and even what resonance effects are going on
in there.  Again, the only way to check compatibility is a real EMC test.

Real meaning that although CISPR emissions and IEC immunity requirements are
colloquially termed EMC limits and requirements, they are in fact EMI limits
and requirements, which are levied to increase the probability of overall EMC
between the units which make up the integrated system, in this case an
ambulance.  In the general case of commercial EMI testing, the qualification
test is the final EMC-related activity - there is no higher level of testing. 
But when you put together a moving platform, you had better check that
everything plays well together, so the scenario envisioned by Mr. Owsley would
be caught during the EMC test, not during actual use.

Note that the EMI requirements levied on equipment that is designed to go in
moving platforms, whether commercial or military, are based on different
separation and different installations entirely.  The antenna - EUT separation
is one meter and the equipment is typically placed on a metallic ground plane,
which simulates the platform installation.



From: Bill Owsley <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Grasso, Charles" <[email protected]>, "Conway, Patrick R
\(Houston\)" <[email protected]>, "Garnier, David S \(GE Healthcare\)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Internal Margins for Emissions Testing




Fits right in to when I was an EMT.  I get called to see one you because of
your chest pains and after hooking up the 12 lead heart monitor and finding
evidence of an ongoing heart attack, I turn on the radio to setup
communications with the hospital and find it blocked, and when I key the mike
to check, it messes up the heart traces really bad too.  No problem, in a few
minutes - one less opinion in the margin discussion.  Okay, so it wasn't one
of you, at least not one I knew, but a brief time it was a very impressive
opinion.  
 


"Grasso, Charles" <[email protected]> wrote:
 


Without getting too much off the point:
My wife works as an ICU nurse and I can tell you that the
available functionality available on those products (i.e the
software) trumps any amount of emissions margin everytime!!



Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications Corp.
Tel: 303-706-5467
Fax: 303-799-6222
Cell: 303-204-2974
Pager/Short Message: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Conway,
Patrick R (Houston)
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:31 PM
To: Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare); [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Internal Margins for Emissions Testing

Interesting point...

- I guess engineers in the medical field have an real good answer to the
question "why do we need margin?"



Best Regards,

Patrick.
[email protected]



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Garnier,
David S (GE Healthcare)
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:00 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Internal Margins for Emissions Testing

Bob,

Amen Brother!

Regards,

Dave Garnier

PS: 

In an ICU room you can have many pieces of medical electronics connected
to the patient, all of these devices may meet their repective
requirements under 60601-1-2 and 2-x sub-requirements but still
interfere with each other. 
Having said that, there are some imaging or monitoring technologies that
have difficulties playing nicely with each other.

Gentlemen, when you see your loved one go under a product you cert'ed
and audited over the years, you gain a whole different perspective of
your job!

Regards,

Dave Garnier 

David Garnier 
e GE HealthCare 
___________________________________________ 

David S. Garnier 
Quality Assurance Technician 
Quality-DI RA-EMC 
3000 N. Grandview Ave - M/S W-1250 
Waukesha, Wi. 53188 
Tel: 262.312.7246 
Cel: 414.899.7580 





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fw: Internal Margins for Emissions Testing

John, I agree...............but not if I'm laying on a table in an
operating room : )

Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
========================================================================
====




John Woodgate



o.uk>
To 
Sent by: [email protected]

[email protected]
cc 



Subject 
06/27/2007 10:40 Re: Internal Margins for
Emissions 
AM Testing

















In message
<[email protected]>, dated
Wed, 27 Jun 2007, "Kunde, Brian" writes:

>I wish the standard had the margin built in somehow, but that doesn't 
>seem practical for everyone.

They do have margin built-in, but you won't get many to admit it,
because it sounds bad, politically. Also, manufacturers can only take
advantage of it if they can use the 80-80 rule (which allows a small
percentage of non-compliant product to be shipped).

Interference that matters results in complaints to authorities. If
no-one complains, it can't matter, can it?

So it makes economic and practical sense to set the limits so that there
is a small but manageable level of complaint. Few will admit that this
is what is done, but, whether intentional or not, it IS what happens in
many cases. If there are never any complaints, the limit is set too low,
maybe a lot too low, isn't it?

So the 'margin' is between the actual limit (resulting in, say, 10
complaints a year) and that higher limit (resulting in, say, 50
complaints a year) that would cause the authorities to demand its
reduction.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of
2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc





  _____  


Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48251/*http
//smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting/?p=PASSPORTPLUS> -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. 
  Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas           [email protected] Mike Cantwell          
[email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher:             [email protected] David Heald:           
[email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to