Why is it good that the 'RF head' is separate and/or can be attached to the antenna?
Brian the EMC amateur -----Original Message----- From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Derek Walton Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:21 PM To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations? Just a quick note about the Teseq Receiver. I think you really mean the PMM marketed by Teseq. This really is a super little receiver. It's CISPR compliant, but it also does neat tricks like has a click option, and also the MIL 6 dB BW. My favorite feature though is that the RF head is separate and can attach directly on the antenna. Optical fibre feeds the signal outside the chamber and breaks any ground connections... That's sweet! The 18 GHz module was released at the IEEE EMC show. I'm sure R and S is good stuff, but its way too many $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ My 10 cents worth. Derek Walton L F Research - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
