Good heavens ladies and gentlemen. I have received lots and lots of information on the DOC, and my memory is well refreshed. It's always a surprise and a pleasure to see the knowledge and help that can pour forward >from the list members - thank you.
Thank you Gary -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:31 AM To: [email protected] Cc: McInturff, Gary Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC DoC Hi Gary: I went to the FCC website & typed 'equipment labels'. It returned several hits, and result #4 was: http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/procedures.html Links on this page give examples of labels for the different types of equipment authorization. Is this the info you're looking for? Pat Lawler EMC Engineer SL Power Electronics Corp. Larry Stillings <[email protected]> wrote on 09/22/2010 06:44:40 AM: > It would be nice if they released something official on this, > specifically on the OET website, as using the DoC logo was never > intended to be used for a Class A device, only Class B Computers and > Peripherals. > > Larry > > From: Doug Kramer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC DoC > > To add to that, you can use the FCC logo on products for which the > manufacturer creates a DoC and fully follows the DoC requirements. > Testing performed by an accredited lab and fully documented in an > endorsed report by that lab, information in manual and provided to > user (15.19 and 15.21) and the creation of the DoC document meeting > the Part 2 requirements. > > > > When I get home I can dig up the response from the FCC on that > question I posed to them not 4 months ago, as we had a customer who > wanted to use the logo on a Class A device. > > > > -Doug Kramer > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Hulbert > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:51 AM > To: Andrew Robbins; Charlie Blackham; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC DoC > > > > That's correct. I have seen the FCC mark used on many products in- > correctly (including even on some class A products). But the mark > and the declaration of conformity are specifically meant for class > computers and computer peripherals. Also...the declaration of > conformity procedures do require a test report from an accredited test lab. > > > > Jim Hulbert > > Pitney Bowes > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Andrew Robbins > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 6:25 PM > To: Charlie Blackham; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC DoC > > > > As I recall the DoC procedure and that new FCC mark was > specifically aimed at computers and computer peripherals which > previously had to be Certified by the FCC (prior to 97). It was a > result of complaints from HP and Intel about the length of time it > took the FCC to review submittals for Certification. It does not > apply to any Class A devices which were already eligible for > Verification (similar to DoC in practice) and was not meant to > apply to other digital devices sold for use in the home (Class B) > that are not "computers and computer peripherals". ET Docket No. 95-19 > > > > BR- Andrew > > From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC DoC > > > > Gary > > > > I've used the following format, not dissimilar to EU DoC, which > seems to cover requirements in 47CFR2 subpart J : > > > > We > > [Company Name] (of Manufacturer or Importer, which must be located > within USA) > > [Company Address] (which must be located within USA) > > > > declare under our sole responsibility that the products: > > > > [Product name and number] > > > > to which this declaration relates are in conformity with the > following regulations > > 47 CFR 15 > > > > [Signature] > > [name] > > [title] > > [date] > > > > Don't know if it's "right", but never had any complaints J > > > Regards > Charlie > > From: McInturff, Gary [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 20 September 2010 21:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [PSES] FCC DoC > > I think I've gotten a little sloppy in my documentation. The FCC > back in about 1982 had a Declaration of Conformity very similar to > the EU's CE Declaration of Conformity, but I haven't seen it used > or used it in some time. Rather the product carried the required > part 15 markings, and their was a heading in the manual that said > FCC DoC that simply stated it was tested and passed Class A or B. > The user warnings about moving things around or modifying the thing > were in that section as well. Over time I had completely forgotten > about the FCC DoC. > > Are these still being generated and can anyone give me an example > of this, as I remember its an internally generated document one you > got the official test complete at an approved lab. > > We generate all of the CE Documents, when appropriate, but this is > the first time I've had a customer request one. We did send the > test report but they are insistant that we give them a FCC DoC. > Happy to obligue but would like to find the reference CFR 47 part > 2(?) and an example if someone can share. > > Thanks > Gary McInturff - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
