Hi Gary:

I went to the FCC website & typed 'equipment labels'.  It returned several 
hits, and result #4 was:
   http://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/procedures.html
Links on this page give examples of labels for the different types of 
equipment authorization.

Is this the info you're looking for?

Pat Lawler
EMC Engineer
SL Power Electronics Corp.

Larry Stillings <[email protected]> wrote on 09/22/2010 
06:44:40 AM:
> It would be nice if they released something  official on this, 
> specifically on the OET website, as using the DoC logo was  never 
> intended to be used for a Class A device, only Class B Computers and
> Peripherals.
>  
> Larry
> 
> From: Doug Kramer [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC  DoC
> 
> To  add to that, you can use the FCC logo on products for which the 
> manufacturer  creates a DoC and fully follows the DoC requirements. 
> Testing performed by  an accredited lab and fully documented in an 
> endorsed report by that lab,  information in manual and provided to 
> user (15.19 and 15.21) and the creation of  the DoC document meeting
> the Part 2 requirements.
> 
>  
> 
> When  I get home I can dig up the response from the FCC on that 
> question I posed to  them not 4 months ago, as we had a customer who
> wanted to use the logo on a  Class A device.  
> 
>  
> 
> -Doug  Kramer
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim 
Hulbert
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:51 AM
> To: Andrew Robbins; Charlie  Blackham; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC  DoC
> 
>  
> 
> That's  correct.  I have seen the FCC mark used on many products in-
> correctly  (including even on some class A products).  But the mark 
> and the  declaration of conformity are specifically meant for class 
> computers and  computer peripherals.  Also...the declaration of 
> conformity procedures do  require a test report from an accredited test 
lab.
> 
>  
> 
> Jim  Hulbert
> 
> Pitney  Bowes
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Andrew Robbins
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 6:25 PM
> To: Charlie Blackham;  [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC  DoC
> 
>  
> 
> As  I recall the DoC procedure and that new FCC mark was 
> specifically aimed at  computers and computer peripherals which 
> previously had to be Certified by the  FCC (prior to 97).  It was a 
> result of complaints from HP and Intel about  the length of time it 
> took the FCC to review submittals for  Certification.   It does not 
> apply to any Class A devices which were  already eligible for 
> Verification (similar to DoC in practice) and was not meant  to 
> apply to other digital devices sold for use in the home (Class B) 
> that are  not "computers and computer peripherals".  ET Docket  No. 
95-19
> 
>  
> 
> BR-  Andrew 
> 
> From: Charlie Blackham  [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21,  2010 2:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re:  [PSES] FCC DoC
> 
>  
> 
> Gary
> 
>  
> 
> I've  used the following format, not dissimilar to EU DoC, which 
> seems to cover  requirements in 47CFR2 subpart J :
> 
>  
> 
> We
> 
> [Company  Name] (of Manufacturer or Importer, which must be located 
> within  USA)
> 
> [Company  Address] (which must be located within USA)
> 
>  
> 
> declare  under our sole responsibility that the products:
> 
>  
> 
> [Product  name and number]
> 
>  
> 
> to  which this declaration relates are in conformity with the 
> following regulations 
> 
> 47  CFR 15
> 
>  
> 
> [Signature]
> 
> [name]
> 
> [title]
> 
> [date]
> 
>  
> 
> Don't  know if it's "right", but never had any complaints J
>  
> 
> Regards
> Charlie
> 
> From: McInturff, Gary  [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 20 September 2010  21:20
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [PSES] FCC  DoC
> 
> I think I've gotten a  little sloppy in my documentation. The FCC 
> back in about 1982 had a Declaration  of Conformity very similar to 
> the EU's CE Declaration of Conformity, but I  haven't seen it used 
> or used it in some time. Rather the product carried the  required 
> part 15 markings, and their was a heading in the manual that said 
> FCC  DoC that simply stated it was tested and passed Class A or B. 
> The user warnings  about moving things around or modifying the thing
> were in that section as well.  Over time I had completely forgotten 
> about the FCC DoC. 
> 
> Are these still being  generated and can anyone give me an example 
> of this, as I remember its an  internally generated document one you
> got the official test complete at an  approved lab. 
>  
> We generate all of  the CE Documents, when appropriate, but this is 
> the first time I've had a  customer request one. We did send the 
> test report but they are insistant that we  give them a FCC DoC. 
> Happy to obligue but would like to find the reference CFR  47 part 
> 2(?) and an example if someone can share.
> 
> Thanks
> Gary McInturff

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to