More info from PG&E on US grid voltage ranges here
<https://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/mybusiness/customerservice/energystatus/powerquality/voltage_tolerance.pdf>
.

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Pete Perkins <
00000061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote:

> Brian, et al,
>
>         I don't believe that anyone has pointed out that voltage
> tolerances are derived from the range that is assigned by the power
> utilities  - regulated in most developed countries - and needed so that the
> national power grid can be interconnected without additional trouble.
>
>         In North America the usual Voltage tolerance is +6/-10% (why
> deliver a higher voltage so that the user gets more power for the same
> price, but regulate the lower limit so that the user gets a minimum amount
> of power for their money).
>
>         Much of the rest of the world uses a Voltage tolerance of +10/-10%.
>
>         So, test houses use these values in testing equipment to ensure
> that it will work properly over the usual range of Voltage.
>
>         Designers need to understand this in designing the product but no
> need, as has been said, to put this on the product.  The nominal voltages
> or voltage ranges provided imply that the equipment will work at the
> Voltages shown including their tolerances.
>
>         The advent of electronic power supplies on lots of equipment has
> simplified the designers life since, in a simple descriptive way, the power
> supply is current driven and works independent of the supply Voltage to
> provide the needed output.
>
> :>)     br,      Pete
>
> Peter E Perkins, PE
> Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
> PO Box 23427
> Tigard, ORe  97281-3427
>
> 503/452-1201
>
> p.perk...@ieee.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 11:18 AM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Voltage Rating vs Voltage Specification
>
> Hi Brian:
>
> > Is something like this allowed?
> >
> > 100-115-120/208-220-230-240
>
> Unless the applicable standard says otherwise, yes.
>
> What is the safety issue (injury) that results from non-compliance with
> the standard's rules for marking configuration of the input rating?
>
> > Will a ±10% tolerance always be assumed?
>
> Usually, yes.
>
> > If your tolerance
> > was something different, such as -15%/+10%, does this information have
> > to be on the device or is the manual good enough?
>
> Your "tolerance" will be used by the certification house if it is greater
> than the standard's "tolerance."  However, you need not specify the
> tolerance.
>
> The "tolerance" need not be marked on the product; the standard does not
> require that you specify a tolerance.  So, it is your choice to specify a
> tolerance or not, and where to place a tolerance.
>
> Best regards,
> Rich
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
> emc-p...@ieee.org>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
> emc-p...@ieee.org>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>
> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
> http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
> well-used formats), large files, etc.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
> unsubscribe)
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
>



-- 
Scott Aldous | Regulatory Compliance Program Manager |
scottald...@google.com | 650-253-1994

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to