FUS audit and certification and license costs are not necessarily able to be 
distributed over a larger production number; will depend on the particular 
NRTL/SCC.

For many product combinations,  there is no cost efficiency for volume or for 
factory consolidation for the respective 'regulatory' remit. The agencies will 
always find a way to structure fees and processes to extract maximum dollars 
and minimize engineering time. That is, for any given agency, invoiced line 
items will always increase, while provided services will always decrease.

Doubleplusgood. Less is more.

Brian
Senior News Reviewer of Oceania


From: Pete Perkins [mailto:00000061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 8:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] UL Listing of Computer Keyboard

James,

               As an American I’m not privy to the inner workings of making the 
sausage called EU Directives.  However, there is a political process involved 
an all of this work and I’m sure that manufacturers and political regulators 
pushed back and forth to get to the final result for the update to the LVD.  I 
agree with your assessment that companies don’t want the extra cost of type 
approval and have prevailed at this point for this set of circumstances.  

               Somewhat related comment; since your keyboard is USB powered you 
need to understand that USB, like POE, is going to higher power delivery – 100W 
coming for USB3.  There are additional issues that need to be addressed and IEC 
62368-3 addresses power over communication cables no matter what the product 
type is; products using such comm cables will need to be assessed to ensure 
that they provide the proper protection coming and going when attached to these 
common outlet sockets.  Again, NRTL certification is appropriate for evaluating 
this equipment.  

               Finally, yes, these NRTL certifications are on a product by 
product basis; you can bunch similar models into one certification report tho.  
From experience, the FUS unit cost decreases as there is more product produced. 
 Increasing the volume of either a product model or adding more similar models 
will drive down the unit cost as the inspection time is spread over more models 
and units.  For instance for your 1K dollars/Euros or whatever, if the factory 
only produces a single unit per inspection quarter then that unit eats the 
entire cost; if the factory produces 10K units per inspection quarter then the 
unit cost is quite cheap.  

:>)     br,      Pete

Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

503/452-1201

IEEE Life Fellow
p.perk...@ieee.org

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to