Hi Ray,

I kinda caught that but was moving beyond that to see if anyone has  
knowledge of emc on the newer
(intel) Mac boxes.

Dave
On Sep 9, 2007, at 9:26 PM, Ray Henry wrote:

>
> Hi Dave
>
> Perhaps you missed my point.  All of the EMC was running on headless
> linux boxes.  The Mac was the display point for the interfaces to  
> these
> boxes.  No need to build a custom kernel or a custom ethernet board.
> Both the headless Linux/rtai/emc boxes and the Mac had ethernet  
> ready to
> do what the NML stuff requires.
>
> With some of the "Modern" GUI interfaces this poses a problem because
> they insist on direct to HAL communication.
>
> Ray
>
>
> On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 19:58 -0700, Dave Engvall wrote:
>> The Mac mini's are very tempting. Duo 2 core. 1.8 GHz .  Runs OSX
>> ( BSD unix ) with an Apple replacement of X on top.
>> AFIK X the proper compile of X runs just fine. The only problem is
>> the lack of EMC compatible I/O. The mini's have USB, Ethernet, and
>> Firewire.  The really nice thing is the package ... about the size of
>> 6 CD cases stacked.
>>
>> I have no data on how well it runs with a linux/rt kernel.   Anybody
>> have any data?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Ray Henry wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dan Falck was running several machines at the same time from a Mac
>>> Cube
>>> in the late 1990s.  Run each machine's EMC headless and make an NML
>>> socket to whatever machine you want to use to run it.  We  
>>> demonstrated
>>> that it could be done from a MS-OS at the NAMES show in about  
>>> 2000 or
>>> 2001.  I was running a box 200 miles away the other day using an
>>> Xterm.
>>> No need for anything special and I think Mac can handle Xterm  
>>> about as
>>> well as Linux.
>>>
>>> At the price of PC's these days you can probably get this sort of
>>> setup
>>> for less than the base price of a G100.
>>>
>>> Rayh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 15:59 -0700, Alan Condit wrote:
>>>> Jon,
>>>>> Jon wrote:
>>>>> Why do you want the G100?  There are a number of cheaper, more
>>>>> capable interfaces to step/direction drives that give you a
>>>>> number of advanced features the G100 still lacks.  For instance,
>>>>> my Universal Stepper Controller :
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jelinux.pico-systems.com/univstep.html
>>>>>
>>>>> It is only $250, and it allows you to connect encoders so you
>>>>> can detect actual position at all times, even when you crash or
>>>>> hit E-stop, it also has opto-isolators for 16 digital inputs and
>>>>> positions to plug in 8 solid state relays for spindle, coolant,
>>>>> etc.  Finally, it supports spindle sync for lathe threading and
>>>>> rigid tapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I know, no one is working on interfacing the G-100 to  
>>>>> EMC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> Some of us are still hoping someday to not have to use a parallel
>>>> port to communicate with the CNC machine. I personally am hoping
>>>> someday to be able to control EMC2 from my Mac (read no parallel
>>>> ports). USB or ethernet look like the most likely prospects. The
>>>> solution may be to use something like G100 or ARC100 at the machine
>>>> and axis running remote but, we can always dream that someone will
>>>> find a solution to allow EMC2 to operate over USB or ethernet.
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Alan Condit
>>>> 1085 Tierra Ct.
>>>> Woodburn, OR 97071
>>>>
>>>> Email -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Home-Office (503) 982-0906
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> --
>>>> ----
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to