On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:24:31AM -0700, Kirk Wallace wrote: > > I meant to have the process running in the background, all the time so > that if you are making a part, it can detect the fault before it is > finished.
With hardware counting, it would be only for very slow speeds that emc would see every count (one edge per servo cycle). So, the kind of fault detection you describe would have to be in the hardware. Jon's idea for an "offline" test is good (you'd just have to run it slow enough) and I've actually done that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
