On 5 May 2012 18:24, gene heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> wrote: > So I cannot use that signal1 defined name as an 'out1' in another net > statement, but must add the other targets/pins in the same line it is > defined in.
No, that is all wrong too. Every "net" command is followed immediately by a signal name. That is, a name you have chosen yourself, to make sense to you (or to confuse yourself horribly in the future, if you so choose). You can uses the same signal name on as many net commands as you like. But being a signal name it needs to be the first term after the word "net" Every "net" command with the same signal name will pass the same value to every HAL pin listed in the command. And that value will be from the one, and only one, output pin that appears in one of the net commands. You can even not bother with the output pin if you want, and set the signal name directly with sets. -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
