On 4/3/2014 7:17 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 3 April 2014 12:30, Mark Tucker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Exactly what is the 2.6 branch bringing to the table at this point?? >> As someone has already stated,why can it not be a case of switch the new >> TP on/off in the ini. >> It is the only way it will get tested properly. > If there was an "inner circle" that made this decision, then I wasn't > part of it. > But: Something as big as a new TP would always be expected to live in > the "master" branch for a while where adventurous users could > experiment with it and shake out the bugs. > The "Released" versions are meant to be tested and known-good. > > 2.6 will introduce the things introduced to Master since the 2.5 > release (which was 31st March 2012, quite a long time ago). > This includes things such as G-code remapping (including Python access > to interp state), a couple of new GUIs (gscreen and gmoccapy) and some > more HAL components. > > I think there was a list somewhere, it is more than you might guess, > but less than was expected.
I agree, the new TP should definitely be in master as an option. I guess the big question for me is how soon will 2.7 be released that includes UB ? If it is a few months, that is a lot different than a few years. And yes, I know putting this all together is a lot of work and I truly appreciate that. :-) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
