> On 4 Oct 2014, at 19:53, Ron Ginger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> One of the complaints often heard about LinuxCNC is that it is
> controlled by a small group of programmers and the only things they add
> are things they like/want
This is s fair way off of the truth as it assumes that the project is
controlled at all.
Are you suggesting that the unpaid hobbyists who write code for LinuxCNC should
be obliged to write code for features on request?
That seems a bit much to ask.
Don't assume that there is a pool of programmers on call being given tasks by
the "board" to add features on request.
As for the feature being discussed, it looks like a fairly simple change to a
single C++ file that I linked to earlier. There is no need to be a trained
software engineer to experiment on that file with adding a GOTO statement.
That was how I started when I decided to add support for the Mesa three phase
PWM, just looking at existing code and adding modified versions, and learning C
at the same time. It was even fun.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
