It only sort of does. If a kernel or X dev decides to access hardware directly to get his project done he probably will. Unfortunately there is no kernel police and no really agreed upon rules that they explicitly follow.
On 03/16/2016 12:10 PM, John Dammeyer wrote: > But see here's where I'm confused. If Linux already provides priorities of > tasks: > http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2013/08/nice-renice-command-examples/ > then the LinuxCNC as a task can run higher than anything else. > If the motion/encoder control is offloaded to a device driver, which should > have even higher priority then where does the real time kernel of the > LinuxCNC fit in? > John Dammeyer > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
