On Monday 22 October 2018 14:13:00 andy pugh wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 09:26, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > > Laying awake thinking about this lathe, and its hal configuration, > > it seems like it would be at least as handy as sliced bread, to have > > a utility that could collect all the processing delays and sort them > > according to the addf order, giving a database of total delays so > > that one could more easily see where a signal processing step was > > out of order, causing a 1 or more total thread processing delay in a > > given signals path thru all the modules. > > I don't think that HAL does any parallel processing, so my first guess > is that this is non-issue. > (My second guess is that I have misunderstood the question) > > Basically, by the time any HAL component reads its inputs all the > upstream components have updated their outputs.
This is the ideal addf order, but we need a tool to yell at us when we are out of order. -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
