It would be the same setup...  Just using servo amps..   Velocity out of
the pid - position back from the encoders.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021, 8:14 PM andrew beck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not sure Sam.
>
> I have a 7i77 on this mill though also.  So analog control
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021, 12:51 PM Sam Sokolik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am going to ask a stuid question..  If you have a velocity run step gen
> > with pid.   Couldn't you hook a limit3 between the pid and steghen.
> > Because the input is velocity instead of position - wouldn't the
> > acceleration limit in the limit3 be jerk instead of acceleration?   I am
> > sure it doesn't work that way.. I was just thinking you have moved the
> > derivatives up one..
> >
> > (I can tell you it doesn't seem to work in practice - probably because
> the
> > pid will always try to correct the error.  Like maybe you would need to
> > negate the limit3 amount on the feedback side..)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 1:28 PM Scott Harwell via Emc-users <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >  I haven't tried it yet, but this looks promising.
> > > LinuxCNC S-Curve Accelerations
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott H
> > >
> > >
> > >     On Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 12:57:06 PM CDT, Ralph Stirling <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I've also been hoping to see this appear in a Linuxcnc update,
> > > as it has been worked on by a number of people for years.
> > > Here are the most recent threads about jerk-limited trajectory
> planning:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://forum.linuxcnc.org/24-hal-components/40152-jerk-limited-trajectory-planner-hal-component
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://forum.linuxcnc.org/38-general-linuxcnc-questions/34666-c2-smooth-velocity-profile?start=0
> > >
> > > -- Ralph
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: David Berndt [[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 9:01 AM
> > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC); andrew beck
> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] jerk control
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Walla Walla University
> > > email system.
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't have a great need for it with my machines, or the time/brains
> to
> > > implement it. It just seems like a feature we really should have.
> > >
> > >   I'd be willing to participate monetarily in some sort of system to
> > > incentivize the inclusion of jerk control. Perhaps an open-source
> feature
> > > bounty? Does the community want to consider that sort of thing?
> > >
> > > -Dave
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:06:05 -0400, andrew beck <
> > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > hey guys
> > > >
> > > > I am sitting here watching my cnc mill atm its shaking quite a bit
> > > > acceleration is 600mm/sec2  which is not that high i think.  compared
> > to
> > > > every other cnc mill i have used with a commercial controller.  they
> > have
> > > > jerk control and work much better.  so looking forward to when we get
> > > > jerk
> > > > control here on linuxcnc!
> > > >
> > > > but in the mean time i need a poor mans jerk control and thinking of
> a
> > > > limit on the pid output to chop down the initial acceleration for the
> > > > first
> > > > moment in time just so little moves don't shake it to death
> > > >
> > > > andy mentioned that I could maybe use a limit component to limit the
> > > > initial acceleration for the first tiny moment in time to cut down on
> > the
> > > > vibrations.
> > > >
> > > > how do you guys think that could work?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&data=04%7C01%7Cralph.stirling%40wallawalla.edu%7C7457b9607a2d4747a1e508d961a1b508%7Cd958f048e43142779c8debfb75e7aa64%7C0%7C0%7C637648169423748846%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ue%2BwIaVhfay08NBevlCAvyOoNp0qVz9ojUuigRuCOOs%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&data=04%7C01%7Cralph.stirling%40wallawalla.edu%7C7457b9607a2d4747a1e508d961a1b508%7Cd958f048e43142779c8debfb75e7aa64%7C0%7C0%7C637648169423748846%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ue%2BwIaVhfay08NBevlCAvyOoNp0qVz9ojUuigRuCOOs%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to