Alan DeKok [mailto://al...@deployingradius.com] writes:
... > Channel bindings closes a security issue in current deployments of the > EAP protocol. Is that true? If all you want is to solve the case where "...the NAS could tell the user "we're partner X: $0.05 / minute". It could *really* be partner Y: $5.00 / minute. The user naively connects, and the bill is larger than expected. The partner gets paid, and the user gets blamed for not paying attention.", I think that that could probably be accomplished with EAP-TTLS right now. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
