Glen Zorn wrote: > Alan DeKok [mailto://al...@deployingradius.com] writes: >> Channel bindings closes a security issue in current deployments of the >> EAP protocol. > > Is that true? If all you want is to solve the case where "...the NAS could > tell the user "we're partner X: $0.05 / minute". It could *really* be > partner Y: > $5.00 / minute. The user naively connects, and the bill is larger than > expected. The partner gets paid, and the user gets blamed for not paying > attention.", I think that that could probably be accomplished with EAP-TTLS > right now.
There is no standardized mechanism to do that. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
