Hannes, Thanks for the interest. IBAKE was proposed and adopted as a method for device bootstrapping in ETSI M2M. IBAKE is especially suitable in this setting as it is a method that provides mutual authentication and key agreement without the need to rely on third parties such as certificate authorities. So the specific problem that is being solved in ETSI M2M with EAP-IBAKE is device bootstrapping that is access network independent.
Obviously, as an EAP method EAP-IBAKE can address many other problems (as numerous other EAP methods can). Regards, -Violeta -----Original Message----- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@nsn.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:08 AM To: Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta); emu@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Emu] draft-cakulev-emu-eap-ibake Hi Violeta, What problem are you trying to solve with this EAP method? Ciao Hannes > -----Original Message----- > From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > ext Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta) > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:16 PM > To: emu@ietf.org > Subject: [Emu] draft-cakulev-emu-eap-ibake > > All, > Back in IETF 80 we presented EAP-IBAKE. The link to the I-D is provided > below: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cakulev-emu-eap-ibake-01 > > This EAP method is based on the Identity-Based Authenticated Key > Exchange (IBAKE) protocol. IBAKE is a protocol for mutual > authentication and key agreement between two or more endpoints. It is > based on a public-key based authentication mechanism, where each > message is encrypted with the public key of the corresponding endpoint, > as per the Identity Based Encryption (IBE) principles. As a result of > the IBAKE protocol, a shared symmetric key is generated by each > endpoint. > > EAP-IBAKE is specified in ETSI TS 102 690 (stage 2) and ETSI TS 102 921 > (stage 3) as a method for access network independent device and gateway > bootstrapping. > Both specifications are approved and are awaiting publication of EAP- > IBAKE (among other things). > > While this document could be of interest to emu WG, it would probably > require changes to the WG charter. > > Group's opinion about specifying EAP-IBAKE in emu WG as well as > possible changes to the WG charter is highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > -Violeta > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
