Hey, you war mongerer...bringing war to the world since eternity...but too stupid to unsub??
It's true, USAns are degenerated, and AOL is the best provider for them On 09/21/2015 09:11 PM, Lyle wrote: > How can I stop this email and many many others that I keep receiving. > I get 5-10 a day to different peoples and I have tried to find a place > to unsubscribed and have had no luck. I don't have a clue what this > even about. Thanks in advance.😬󾓦 > > *"GOD BLESS AMERICA PLEASE" > Lyle Hensley > Enjoying Every Breath > Retired US Army > 1957 – 1978 > "NEVER GIVE UP" > * > > > ** > * * > > > <http://webpages.charter.net/golddigr/> > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Woehlke > <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com <mailto:mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 2015-09-20 12:58, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > A Privacy red-flag is a little harder to quantify. About the > only case > > I can think of is if a message is encrypted, but with a key that has > > been revoked or does not match the claimed sender. But this should > > probably be considered an Authenticity failure. > > No, actually you were right the first time. Authentication is based on > the integrity of the SENDER'S private key. Encryption is based on the > integrity of the RECEIVER'S private key(s). So, if I send a signed, > encrypted message one or more recipients, one of whom has a > compromised > key, the message may well be authentic (which we can verify if the > sender's key is trusted), but an attacker may be able to read it. > > I could certainly imagine this happening if someone sends you a > message > encrypted using an old public key of yours that you happen to know is > compromised, because the sender is not aware that it is compromised / > revoked. > > (In fact, privacy is the only state that can change after the > fact. If I > send you a message and it is authentic, that is a past event that > cannot > be changed. If an encryption key is compromised, a message that was > previously private may no longer be private.) > > > Should a message that is encrypted but unsigned be considered an > > Authenticity failure - or at least an authenticity warning? > > Encrypting a message and authenticity (signing) are orthogonal; ergo, > whether or not a message is encrypted should not affect reporting of > authenticity. > > -- > Matthew > > > _______________________________________________ > enigmail-users mailing list > enigmail-users@enigmail.net <mailto:enigmail-users@enigmail.net> > To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > enigmail-users mailing list > enigmail-users@enigmail.net > To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list enigmail-users@enigmail.net To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
