Hi, On Nov 11, 2007 3:18 AM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use git locally for doing branched development and push to CVS when > at a stable point. It is sometimes a pain to sync things properly, but > not that bad.
Yes, I'm also doing this and it's a pain like you said (specially when you have to move files, rename, create directories, ...). Ah.. and I'm not even talking about "losing" history when you move/rename files in CVS. > For most people, there is not much benefit of using git > as they develop in a single branch. Yes, you're right, but that's why I said we'd have to change our workflow. With more people integrating and reviewing patches we'd have better code reaching the repository. And that will be very important with the stable version of our libs and apps. Moreover, think about maintaining version 1.0 of our libs and also the development version. We could create modules in CVS for the stable version and keep the development in the "old" module but that only becomes even more painful to work and doesn't scale, IMHO. Regards, -- Ulisses ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
