Michael wrote:
> > It does sound a bit hypocritical. I would disagree with both
> > you and Simon on this.
>
> But my only point was that he was being hypocritical, so you can't
> agree with me and then disagree with me. That makes *you*
> hypocritical. :)
Well, not quite. You did in fact make the point that you
agreed with Simon that there shouldn't be several toolkits --
or at least that's what I took you mean. Here's the original
whole of it:
> > There is no good reason to have three different toolkits in
> > the same project,
> >
> Of course, this is what a lot of other people said about Etk back
> before it got thrown in CVS. So now you sound hypocritical.
I took your "Of course,..." to mean that you agreed with
Simon that there were no good reasons for having....
Where I disagreed with both you and Simon was that aspect,
not your subsequent statement that he sounded hypocritical.
So, either I misread your intended meaning, or you've
misread mine. You decide. :)
jose.
_____________________________________________________________
Find loans exclusively for members of our military. Click now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3olPs8caOkTRZ9dmwf6Ox3Tzb60vxe6jMOPbQaGrjEmjyVQk/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
