On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:24:46 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<barbi...@profusion.mobi> babbled:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Luchezar Petkov
> <luchezar.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> >>
> >> I did basic categorization of enlightenment items and also remove the
> >> idea to drop 16bpp engines as we'll use it in our projects.
> >>
> >> most showstopper atm is file manager items, I think we can do without
> >> them so would flag them (all, or at least most of them) as "optional".
> >
> > I'd disagree with you here. A nice fm is really important to the end users.
> > Using external file browser is just an ugly way (imo) and would 1) make less
> > experienced users ask lots of questions about how to deal with files when
> > using E (and why (and how) should they bother installing external fm) and 2)
> > probably distro packagers are going to pack E with Thunar or something and I
> > don't like that.
> > I'm aware that the fm is probably one of the hardest things to do in E17,
> > but it is too important to just... not finish it.
>
> But it's mostly working for "joe-the-user". Sure, having things like
> Ctrl-{x,c,v} is good, but not hard or blocking.
but these are rather trivial to add - the point is not how many things on the
list but time vs value after implementation. a lot of things are just small "do
it right" things - others are big fat time-sinks.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
