On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:24:46 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <barbi...@profusion.mobi> babbled:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Luchezar Petkov > <luchezar.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> > >> I did basic categorization of enlightenment items and also remove the > >> idea to drop 16bpp engines as we'll use it in our projects. > >> > >> most showstopper atm is file manager items, I think we can do without > >> them so would flag them (all, or at least most of them) as "optional". > > > > I'd disagree with you here. A nice fm is really important to the end users. > > Using external file browser is just an ugly way (imo) and would 1) make less > > experienced users ask lots of questions about how to deal with files when > > using E (and why (and how) should they bother installing external fm) and 2) > > probably distro packagers are going to pack E with Thunar or something and I > > don't like that. > > I'm aware that the fm is probably one of the hardest things to do in E17, > > but it is too important to just... not finish it. > > But it's mostly working for "joe-the-user". Sure, having things like > Ctrl-{x,c,v} is good, but not hard or blocking. but these are rather trivial to add - the point is not how many things on the list but time vs value after implementation. a lot of things are just small "do it right" things - others are big fat time-sinks. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel