On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Toma <tomha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thought Id ping the mailing list about this: >>> >>> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Release >>> >>> As the top of the page says, we need to finalize the list of things >>> TODO. Mekius mentioned removing a couple of the EFM todos and Id >>> welcome that. Im in the process of finishing off the icons, but think >>> some of the dialogs could either get the chop, or get renamed. One of >>> these is 'Interactions', as it has a pile of thumbscroll options. >>> >>> Shall we set a date for closing off the TODO feature list? Any >>> additions after that date will be bugs related to the features. >>> >>> I propose February 14th. Its close, realistic, and might dull the >>> loneliness of Valentines Day. :) >> >> So time has come and we're working on that release list. In the last >> days I've being working on some show stopper stuff like file >> management and I plan to get ride of most items by March. > > Did the same on the eina front :) > >> Some items in the list are very demanding, like finish converting >> ecore data types to eina, but Cedric has some pending patches in >> queue. If people can help with these "easy" items, then we can work on >> more complex stuff and get E17 released soon, making everybody happy, >> with ready to use packages in most distros :-) > > All my pending patch are now in. It should not introduce any > regression. Now e_dbus, efreet and ecore should only return Eina_List. > > Still on the TODO, but this could be done one after another with very > small commit : > - remove ecore_dlist (replace by eina_list) > - remove Ecore_List2 (could be replaced by eina_inlist) > - review every little loop in the code around list and check, if it > would not be better to use EINA_LIST_FREE or EINA_LIST_FOREACH (at the > same time, look if we can avoid useless strdup). ...
I'd say we should inspect places where lists and specially list *copies* are returned and use eina_iterator or eina_accessor instead. In many places we dup the list (1 walk), then use it (+1 walk), then free it (+1 walk), so 3 walk for a simple task. If we used the iterator stuff we could alloc a small amount of memory and do the same thing, just more clean, safer and faster. Comes to mind evas_render_method_list() and similar. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
