On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:41:41 +0100 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > >> <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Toma <tomha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Thought Id ping the mailing list about this: > >>>> > >>>> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Release > >>>> > >>>> As the top of the page says, we need to finalize the list of things > >>>> TODO. Mekius mentioned removing a couple of the EFM todos and Id > >>>> welcome that. Im in the process of finishing off the icons, but think > >>>> some of the dialogs could either get the chop, or get renamed. One of > >>>> these is 'Interactions', as it has a pile of thumbscroll options. > >>>> > >>>> Shall we set a date for closing off the TODO feature list? Any > >>>> additions after that date will be bugs related to the features. > >>>> > >>>> I propose February 14th. Its close, realistic, and might dull the > >>>> loneliness of Valentines Day. :) > >>> > >>> So time has come and we're working on that release list. In the last > >>> days I've being working on some show stopper stuff like file > >>> management and I plan to get ride of most items by March. > >> > >> Did the same on the eina front :) > >> > >>> Some items in the list are very demanding, like finish converting > >>> ecore data types to eina, but Cedric has some pending patches in > >>> queue. If people can help with these "easy" items, then we can work on > >>> more complex stuff and get E17 released soon, making everybody happy, > >>> with ready to use packages in most distros :-) > >> > >> All my pending patch are now in. It should not introduce any > >> regression. Now e_dbus, efreet and ecore should only return Eina_List. > >> > >> Still on the TODO, but this could be done one after another with very > >> small commit : > >> - remove ecore_dlist (replace by eina_list) > >> - remove Ecore_List2 (could be replaced by eina_inlist) > >> - review every little loop in the code around list and check, if it > >> would not be better to use EINA_LIST_FREE or EINA_LIST_FOREACH (at the > >> same time, look if we can avoid useless strdup). > > ... > > > > I'd say we should inspect places where lists and specially list > > *copies* are returned and use eina_iterator or eina_accessor instead. > > In many places we dup the list (1 walk), then use it (+1 walk), then > > free it (+1 walk), so 3 walk for a simple task. If we used the > > iterator stuff we could alloc a small amount of memory and do the same > > thing, just more clean, safer and faster. > > > > Comes to mind evas_render_method_list() and similar. > > Yes, returning Eina_Iterator would be a better solution in many place > in the EFL API. Could be faster and more memory efficient for many > case, and it will explicitely say that a the content of a list should > not be destroyed/modified by the caller. beware of being too gung-ho. some of htese (like evas_render_method_list()) are called so rarely you likely just make the api harder to use for no real gain. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
