On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:53:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 28, 2010, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > with newer gcc, we could optimize link with -flto (and > > also maybe -fwhole-program). Shouldn't we add those options if they are > > available (i have already written m4 macro to add such flags) ? > > I'm all for it you know, but raster keeps opposing even simple > visibility hidden flags > > > > Vincent > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! > > Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by > > optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the > > Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > imo if the flags are available then they should be passed unless an option like --disable-optimizations is specified -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
