On Monday, November 29, 2010, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tom Hacohen
> <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 18:53 -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> I'm all for it you know, but raster keeps opposing even simple
>>> visibility hidden flags
>>
>> I probably missed an old discussion, but why don't we add a
>> --super-optimize configure flag that just turns all the optimizations
>> possible on?
>>
>> This way, stock will remain as raster wants (maybe it's best not to
>> optimize stock too much, you don't compilations to break because of
>> buggy compilers...) but whoever wants will be able to turn all the
>> supported and recommended optimizations on.
>
> I will vote for that idea too. Something like
> --enable-hard-optimization would turn on all this tests and do it if
> possible.

It's acceptable, but I'd go with them by default, particularly those
that help finding programming bugs such as visibility flags and -Wall
-Wextra


-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to