On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Armani <d...@asystant.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:18:29 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> >> said: >> >>> >>> Hey >>> >>> I'm talking a lot with an openBSD dev, and currently it's very hard for >>> them to follow the changes in the trunk. What they would like to have is >>> snapshots to provide easily patches for the EFL. >> >> how is that hard? svn checkout or update instead of wget. u also need to run >> autogen.sh. >> >>> Would it be possible to have, during the freeze period, some daily >>> snashots ? It would be nice to fix the openBSD port for the release. >> >> open to patches, but none have been submitted. > > Are you kidding ? I though you were reading the svn log. I take a lot > of my time pushing / polishing these diff (special thanks to vtorrin, > bluebugs and billiob). > So you come from nowhere and make all this work looking bad, here and > on irc, that's amazing.
Sometimes he acts this way. Don't take it personal, don't let it demotivate you. Keep the good work ! =) > > if they require tarballs to >> test and can't just run svn instead to fetch the source... i don't have the >> time each day to make tarballs when they can just as easily fetch from svn. >> it's the same work on their part. making tarballs is MORE work on our part. > > You missed the point, we want to be sure that the final archive will be ok. > I'm not asking for snapshot on a daily basis, only some rc before the > final archive. > (Wait no project did alpha & rc, right ?) > > >> >>> Note that i discuss also with a Mageia e17 maintainer, and he told me that >>> such snapshots will help him too. >> >> a snapshot has no more quality than an svn checkout, so other than a mental >> block thinking svn == totally unstable/unusable and an unwillingness to use >> it >> because of a mental block, i don't see the point. > > yeah a mental block, I think you don't want to know how many time I > have to reroll a dist to get all working and how frustating it is. > >> >> a release that has had quality assurance done on it is a different matter - >> but >> we arent doing them every day. hell no - not with al the efl trees we have. >> only chance of that is if we stopped having separate libs and just merged >> them >> into a single efl tree. >> >>> Vincent >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> enlightenment-devel mailing list >>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >>> >> >> >> -- >> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- >> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >> Save $700 by Nov 18 >> Register now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Bruno Dilly Senior Developer ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
