On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz < michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100 > Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri > > > <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to > > >> execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input > > >> and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner. > > > > > > I suspect the epp licence is the reason. > > > > aaarrrrggg. You're right :( > > > > Vincent > confirmed. > Humm.. edje is LGPL (afaik) and epp is GPL.. how about making edje_cc (only) a GPLv2 app and keep the rest of the lib to its current license.. that could be a solution. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Mar 27 - Feb 2 > Save $400 by Jan. 27 > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
