On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Youness Alaoui <kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz < > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:26:17 +0100 >> Vincent Torri <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM, David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:00:06 +0100 Vincent Torri >> > > <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> as we have epp source code, why creating a program and trying to >> > >> execute it, instead of having a function that takes a buffer as input >> > >> and create a preprocessed buffer as ouput ? Imho, it would be cleaner. >> > > >> > > I suspect the epp licence is the reason. >> > >> > aaarrrrggg. You're right :( >> > >> > Vincent >> confirmed. >> > Humm.. edje is LGPL (afaik) and epp is GPL.. how about making edje_cc > (only) a GPLv2 app and keep the rest of the lib to its current license.. > that could be a solution.
edje is BSD-like, but indeed, having just edje_cc GPL is maybe not so problematic. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Mar 27 - Feb 2 Save $400 by Jan. 27 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
