On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Lucas De Marchi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Leandro Pereira <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> On 09/20/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other changelog in the
>>> entire universe...
>>
>> I honestly thought Edje was stable enough that it didn't have recent
>> changes -- and since ChangeLogs are traditionally written with newer
>> entries on top, I just added mine there.
>>
>> I'll be more careful next time. I'll still mutter something about
>> ChangeLogs being useless given we have commit messages (which can be as
>> long as needed to explain stuff, is easier to merge, is as good a cold
>> beer on a hot day, yadda yadda yadda), though.
>
> +1 to drop ChangeLog entirely.

Here is the difference between you and me:

you claim that YOU don't need a changelog because there are svn
commits, so every people on earth just have to install svn or look at
a slow websvn to see the changes, even those which are just "oupsie!"
etc...

me, who think  that an average user of a lib should not need to
install svn (or git or etc...) or use a slow websvn to look quickly at
a changelog file. And I say that because it was in that very
situation.

You think only about yourself, i thnk about everyone.

It takes time to write entries but i'm not lazy. I take that time, on
my very limited free time.

Vincent

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to