On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:28 AM, David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:19:51 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >> <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Vincent Torri >>> <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz >>> > <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> ah, if only we could do changelogs sanely like every other >>> >> changelog in the entire universe... >>> > >>> > i mentioned that several times: the moap tool >>> > >>> > 1) moap cl prep >>> > 2) you edit ChangeLog >>> > 3) moap cl ci >>> > >>> > that's all >>> >>> that's not sane neither. >>> >>> >>> sane: before release you run a command once and only once to turn the >>> commit messages into changelog entries. >> >> That only works if our commit messages are sane. I point to the commit >> that started this thread as an example. Though most are sane, so > > Most are insane, I'd say... and that's the first thing to fix
svn log != ChangeLog. In svn log, you have every little change. In ChangeLog you only have a summary of the change that happen between revision - 1 and revision. No need to see all the little fix in the middle. Thinking that every commit should become a ChangeLog entry is insane. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
