On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 01:40:25 -0300 Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira <vini.ipsma...@gmail.com> said:
> 2014-08-17 1:24 GMT-03:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>: > > > compile-time for efl itself. you have to build it without checking. i'd > > advise > > against it because efll uses its own objects internally and if efl has a > > mistake in it you just nuked efl's own internal safety. i highly suggest > > not > > doing this. > > > > it may be that we remove the ability to compile without this check in the > > end > > as i an just see it now. gentoo ricers are going to add a use flag to turn > > this > > off and then we will get tonnes of stability complaints because the rest > > of us > > normal people run without turning the safety off. > > > > it's worth keeping this safety on. it doesn't cost much and is totally > > worth > > it. > > > > I'd like to see this checking disabled per call only, not globally. Then > only bindings for safe languages would use it. > > I'll leave the safety checks turned on. They're worth. Also, EFL is for GUI > only and heavy computing sensitive data can be implemented without negative > impact by just not touching EFL (temporally). > > Once more, good work. thats what we do - if it really is performance sensitive - dont go through eo. it's meant for the outer layer of api. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
